The calendar year of 2011 was a difficult one for Sean O’Driscoll. After previously being linked with a number of high-profile jobs, O’Driscoll suffered a difficult spell at Doncaster Rovers and subsequently lost his role as manager.
O’Driscoll was in pole position to land a Premier League managerial position at Burnley in January 2010 and a Championship job at Sheffield United at the end of the year but opted to stay at Donny.
A high number of injuries in 2011 sparked a terrible slump in performances and results and, after collecting 17 points from a total of 31 games, O’Driscoll bit the bullet.
Was this a harsh decision by the club? Yes and no. O’Driscoll had done well enough to keep his job as long as he wanted it, but the reality was that relegation was staring Doncaster in the face unless something changed.
Some might stay that a drop down to League One after four consecutive years in the Championship is a natural one for a club with our limited finances and, in that event, O’Driscoll would be the ideal man to build another promotion-chasing side.
But the men who put the money into Doncaster Rovers desperately want to preserve the club’s Championship status and decided a change was necessary. This was hard to argue against based on the statistics alone.
Personally I don’t feel that staying up in the Championship is the be-all and end-all to a club of our size but, at the end of the day, who knows how I’d feel if it was my millions being pumped into Rovers.
So, although I would have kept O’Driscoll on and was sad to see him go, I can understand why the board felt something had to give.
Since then, the former Bournemouth stalwart has been linked with jobs at Bristol Rovers, Northampton Town and Preston North End but opted instead to work as an unofficial mentor to Carl Fletcher, one of his former players, at Plymouth.
I tweeted only yesterday that seemed to be, with all due respect to Argyle, a disappointing situation for O’Driscoll. Plymouth are bottom of the Football League and O’Driscoll wasn’t even being given the opportunity to manage them.
Plymouth are a fine club in their own right but surely O’Driscoll, in five generally successful years at Doncaster, deserved another chance in the Championship.
Only hours after posting that tweet, O’Driscoll had one. But I have to say, like Plymouth, it’s another interesting situation to say the least. O’Driscoll has not been given a managerial position; he has landed the role as first team coach at struggling Nottingham Forest.
Helping out former Bournemouth colleague Steve Cotterill in the second tier of English football at a club with a great history is a good opportunity to get back into football on the face of it. However, when you examine things a little more closely, the move to bring in O’Driscoll to assist Cotterill does not make a huge amount of sense to the untrained eye.
Their personalities and methods are chalk and cheese; as footballers and managers. O’Driscoll was the creative central midfielder at the heart of Bournemouth’s play while Cotterill played the role of old-fashioned centre forward.
Cotterill is the firefighter, the streetfighter, the man who loves to develop a siege mentality in a bid to galvanise his charges. His pragmatic approach is not generally liked by supporters but Cotterill has got results at Stoke, Burnley, Notts County and Portsmouth. It’s understandable. Aesthetics don’t pay the rent, after all. They don’t go down in the history books.
O’Driscoll is a football romantic who places emphasis on processes and not outcomes. For him, performance is everything because you cannot control the result. In O’Driscoll’s mind, if you focus on all of those behind the scene nitty-gritties, then the end product will look after itself.
He too has operated on a shoestring but demands footballers who fit a certain profile. O’Driscoll wants forward-thinkers, those who are brave enough to demand the ball and take command of its destiny. O’Driscoll wants his team to dominate possession, even if they are not actively looking to score. If you have the ball, the opposition can’t do any damage, after all.
Cotterill’s definition of bravery is different. He is a man of the trenches, one who wants his colleagues to fight for everything. Cotterill is happy to sacrifice possession for territory, the master of the nicked 1-0 away win with men tucked safely behind the ball. Those battling qualities his sides possess were one of the reasons he was given the job in the first place.
His start was promising but suddenly, it’s all gone a bit Frank Spencer. Forest have won just once in eleven games, and in the ten matches where they have failed to win, they have also failed to score. Their latest defeat, a disgraceful 4-0 F.A.Cup defeat at Leicester, epitomised their problems.
Granted they were without their rocks, Wes Morgan and Luke Chambers, and key striker Marcus Tudgay, but Forest defended like schoolboys, even with six men designed to be behind the ball at all times, and showed little attacking intent.
The third goal was a microcosm of their miserable evening, with one direct ball causing problems. Joel Lynch was easily beaten for a header by David Nugent and Jermaine Beckford got the wrong side of makeshift centre half Guy Moussi. There was no clever build-up play, or cute use of angles, just a punt forward, a flick on, and a neat finish.
Jonathan Greening and George Boateng were brought in as experienced midfield minds but their bodies look tired. Their limited possession was shifted sideways and backwards, their shield-like qualities were not apparent. Andy Reid is a technician but was in no man’s land between the midfield and lone frontman, Marlon Harewood, who was given aimless long balls to chase. Forest’s wide men were ineffective and one of them, Robbie Findley, missed their one clear-cut chance – the definition of an open goal, even in the world of football clichés.
Based on the evidence of Tuesday evening, it is hard to see how O’Driscoll cannot come to Forest’s aid but how will the new structure work?
If O’Driscoll preaches a careful passing game on the training ground but Cotterill prefers his more direct methods, then how will it fit together? O’Driscoll refused to sacrifice his principles in five years at Doncaster, even when the team were bottom of the league, so why will that change now? Cotterill has made a living by setting his teams out in a completely different way, so will he change his beliefs at a time when strong minds are needed most?
Cotterill reports the two to be good friends but tensions were high in last season’s meetings between Portsmouth and Doncaster, when the two were rival managers. In a particularly bad-tempered affair at the Keepmoat, O’Driscoll was visibly annoyed by Portsmouth’s tactics and he and Cotterill nearly came face-to-face at one point. It is the only time I’ve ever seen O’Driscoll get cross with an opposing manager. It may just have been a heat of the moment thing, of course.
The reason O’Driscoll left his position at Donny was that results were not forthcoming and that is what Forest need at the moment. Perhaps the best way to get them is to completely change the approach, but O’Driscoll lacks the power to do that as first team coach. If the style is changed, then O’Driscoll will surely get the credit if performances and results improve, and if it isn’t, then it will be obvious that he has not been allowed to make alterations. Either way, Cotterill isn’t going to come out of it with any credit, which makes his position difficult.
If Forest wanted to change their approach, the sensible idea would have been to appoint O’Driscoll as manager back in November. If they didn’t believe in his methods at that point, then what has changed since? Even if they believe fully in them now, how can they be fully utilised in the position he has been given?
O’Driscoll the tactician and Cotterill the motivator is obviously how it’s seen, but managers hate being pigeon-holed and want full control of the operation. I don’t know what happened to Billy Davies at Forest but he did a great job; nobody realised how good until he had gone. Either side of his appointment, Forest have been in the bottom three in this league so Cotterill and O’Driscoll have their work cut out, however they set about forming a partnership.
O’Driscoll, I feel, can be the man for Forest’s job. Just not necessarily the one he’s been given.